Author Archives: Kelly Hammond

Kelly’s Reflections: Week of 2/18 – 2/25

This week started off with a bang: I successfully built a program in Python that scraped Newbery Honors winners from a website and dumped them into a .csv file that I could, in turn, dump into Google Sheets for the team to investigate.

As has been the case with much of my work in DH so far, the breakthrough was made possible by a combination of online tutorials, trial and error, and logic. While I’d consulted tutorials last week, the majority of them walked me through sample scrapes that were unique to the site being scraped. Monday, though, I found a good introductory tutorial that focused on the big picture of web scraping as it worked through its sample rather than merely giving me code. The tutorial stressed how essential it is to study the architecture of the HTML you want to scrape first—to be able to articulate the sequence of the patterns of code that can isolate the data you need.

In the case of the site I found, the HTML was fairly basic and ambiguous. Instead of using helpful designations such as consistent and unique spans and classes to indicate titles, authors, and dates, the code organized all of the information on the page—introduction, visuals, and Honor book data alike—in rows in a table. So, I had to first use trial and error to isolate the rows that contained the book data, which turned out to be the range of cells [-323:-2]. (Yes, I realize that my range could have been positive, but I thought it easiest to work backward, since the book data extended to nearly the bottom of the page.) The dates of the Honors were tucked, fortunately, in separate cells in the table with a class designation of <td class=”order”>, so that was easy enough to scrape. But both the title and the author for each book were nestled in one table cell for each book, and each had its own anchor tag, which made for tricky disambiguation.

Fortunately, I’d seen Patrick Smyth in a workshop last year parse text by a specific word—maybe it was bylines in newspaper articles, though I don’t really recall. So, employing a bit of logic, I extracted the text of the <td> cells without the class of “order,” and then split that text at the “ by ” juncture, assigning the text prior to the it ([0]) as the title, and after it ([-1]) to the author. Worked like a charm. The rest of the code, which was easy to adapt from the tutorial, turned all of that into a dataframe (a new term for me!) suitable for exportation to a .csv file.

I’m particularly proud of the program for two reasons. First, it is only 17 lines of actual code—far more efficient than any other Python program I’ve written. Second, I employed a trick I learned in Patrick’s software lab last spring: writing comments as a way to solidify my own understanding of my code. So, I feel I am ready to continue to scrape sites as our crew looks at other award winners. (This practice proved to have extra benefits, as our team is interested in learning from each other, and Emily happily mentioned in Tuesday’s class that the comments helped her understand the code too.)

After generating the .csv file, I cleaned the data as I had done with Georgette’s set last week. Again, I saw and documented a slew of potential issues that might prove tricky as we bring this data into Tableau, such as accent marks in author names and even an obviously erroneous attribution of an author as “See and Read” rather than Miska Miles. With both data sets on the Medal winners and Honors winners cleaned, I popped them into Google Sheets for us all to explore and expand. The rest of the week was spent adding to the data set beyond what scraping can do, as Emily and I began to investigate the identities of the books’ protagonists as well as the identities of the Honor authors.

As has been my experience with all data gathering, the realities of the data revealed limitations in our spreadsheet. For example, we didn’t have a uniform approach to protagonists who weren’t human (some were animals, some animals’ nationalities actually mattered in the story, one protagonist was a steam engine, and one story revolved around a family of dolls). Nor did we have a way to indicate multiple protagonists, as is the case for collections of stories or novels with sibling pairs or families in main roles.

As our team discussed in both of our Skype sessions so far, the most important task this upcoming week is to resolve how to deduce, ascribe, and name the identity markers we have already begun to record. As my own students have been studying the Harlem Renaissance this winter, I am reminded that the inaugural year of the Newbery Awards came on the heels of the two-year experiment of the Brownies’ Book—a magazine created by W.E.B. Du Bois and Jessie Fauset to provide black American kids a way to see themselves in print, countering either the predominant white faces normalized in children’s literature of the time or the stereotypes of nonwhite children that abounded. (In fact, I found a 1919 letter from Du Bois responding himself to an inquiry about the use of racial terms in the Brownies’ Book in which he writes, “So long as the masses of educated people are agreed upon the significance of a word, it is impossible for you or me to ignore it, simply because we do not like it.”) So, Georgette will reach out to a host of experts in addition to the help she’s already found from founder of the Diverse Book Finder, and Meg and I will scour the online literature in hopes of additional clarity as we move forward.

As I’ve learned that the Brownies’ Book is due for rerelease this year, in honor of the 100 years since its initial publication, our work seems very timely.

1920 Brownies' Book

Inside cover of the 1920s edition of The Brownies Book. From https://www.loc.gov/item/22001351/

Kelly’s Reflections: Week of 2/11 – 2/18

This week for me was all about orienting myself in greater detail to the scope of the project and my role in it. As our team edited the proposal via Google Docs, I gained a greater appreciation for the potential good our project could do. Georgette had referenced in the proposal a great data repository that could expand the scope of our work: The Database of Award-Winning Children’s Literature (DAWCL). Her find reminds me of one of the many benefits of teamwork. As a non-librarian, I easily might have overlooked the site myself, as its design is a bit dated and amateurish by today’s standards. Yet, a little research confirmed that the information is thorough, accurate, and up-to-date—a real treasure.

As the programmer for our team, I wanted to figure out this week how we might automate data gathering with Python. Georgette had already gathered some initial data on the 98 Newbery Medal winners themselves. DAWCL offers additional data we hope to investigate such as the 400+ titles designated as Newbery Honorees, as well as avenues for broader analysis, such as the other awards Newbery books have won and award-winning titles that haven’t received Newbery recognition.

New to scraping websites with Python, I failed with the DAWCL spectacularly. But, I learned a ton in the process, and I hope to make some breakthroughs in the coming week. The DAWCL makes it easy to sift through thousands of children’s books by award. Yet, it returns its search results via an ASP, so Python can’t simply request the page contents by using the URL. After combing the web for help, I learned to leverage Chrome’s developer tools to dig beyond the first layer of code usually revealed by the Inspect command. I was able, ultimately, to follow the network requests made by the search form as I performed the search for Newbery winners (very cool), and I finally found the html behind the displayed search results. The html is not terribly sophisticated, which actually isn’t great as far as scraping goes. I’d have preferred designated classes for titles, authors, other awards, rather than just paragraph and break tags. So, this week, I’ll need to get creative, either treating the code I found like text and using Python parse it or changing tools to scrape from the ASP.

Lest I held the project up with that exploration, I turned to data cleaning, making some tweaks to the original set that Georgette posted, in hopes of showing up to our first Skype session with something concrete to offer. First, I split author names using Excel’s text-to-columns feature, so that ultimately our users could investigate by an author’s first or last name. Second, using what I learned from a data viz investigation of authors of New York Times bestsellers, I made a note of data that may cause trouble down the road, such as the tilde in Matt de la Peña’s name or the accent grave in William Pène du Bois’s. I also noted ethical issues we’ll need to tackle: keeping track of our data sources and having discussions about what constitutes ethnicity. Not only are these decisions essential to make in the early stages, but they are important to document and convey to our ultimate users.

Having wrapped up our first Skype session earlier this evening, I’m heading into the second week with great optimism. Each member of our team is elevating my thinking about our approach and is spurring me on to find an expedient way to get our data!

NYCDH Week Reflection

Spurred by my enthusiasm for data visualization (thanks, Michelle McSweeney!) and an awareness of my gross underutilization of the vast resources of the New York Public Library, I opted to attend the Information Visualization Open House at the NYPL’s Center for Research in the Humanities. The event offered a lineup of speakers sharing ways that the Center’s holdings have contributed to DH pursuits. And, while I had expected to leave with ideas for ways to leverage their collection for both my graduate studies and my own classroom, I came away with something more important: an astute appreciation for the GC’s motto of “public education for the public good.” The presenters’ work really fell across a spectrum ranging from practical service to perhaps a little academic navel gazing.

 

Clearly benefitting a wide swath of users was a project presented by a representative of the Science Industry Business Library: a tool called Simply Analytics (SA) whose tagline is, “Analytics for Everyone.” SA provides a range of easy-to-manipulate parameters to help non-DH humans visualize data in truly pragmatic ways. The presenter demonstrated how easy it is to determine, say, where a prospective liquor store owner might find an untapped Brooklyn space ripe for business. In just a matter of clicks, he had narrowed his search to two spots. (For the academic among us, he showed how to access metadata on the data sources to boot.) The demonstration was made all the more powerful in that the example came from real life. SCORE, a group of retired and self-professed tech-nervous business people who offer free advice to small business owners, had used SA to help a client research exactly that question. So, while we may argue about whether increasing the number of liquor stores boosts the public good, the tool certainly allows greater access to the kind of data visualization tools often reserved for the tech savvy or for those with money to purchase proprietary software or hire someone to do the work. The only drawback is that it seems you have to be in one of the SA-licensed NYPL buildings, like the main branch, the Schomburg Center, or the Science Industry Business Library itself, to get the free access.

 

On the other side of the spectrum was the Photographers Identities Catalog (PIC), a labor of love by an NYPL photography specialist. The project is a searchable database that visualizes on a dynamic map where prominent photographers were born, did their work, and, if applicable, died. I was particularly interested in the project because my students are currently investigating figures from the Harlem Renaissance, among which are photographers James Van Der Zee and James Latimer Allen. The PIC is complicated and not terribly intuitive, though exploring certainly sparks interesting questions about the arc of a photographer’s life or about demographic or historic trends (since you can filter by, among other categories, gender, nationality, and date). My very surface exploration was ultimately unrewarding, as the data varies wildly by photographer without a particular pattern. At first, I thought there was a predilection for white, well-known photographers. For example, Dorothea Lange has 491 marked locations, while Raghu Rai and Dewoud Bey each have only 1. But, famed Ansel Adams has only 2, and Edward Weston just 1, while my students’ lesser-known research subjects James Van Der Zee and James Latimer Allen have 4 and 5 respectively. Chester Burger, whose collection rests solely at the NYPL, has 1261 locations, yet his work isn’t visible online in a quick Google search, while Mary Ellen Mark has only 2 locations, and neither is connected to the Miami image that is part of the NYPL collection. So, representation seems haphazard. (The site displays no photographs by the photographers, so copyright restriction is not likely to be the issue either.) Further, while the site does a lovely home-page job of encouraging exploration and inviting non-academics in, the interface isn’t built for the lay tech user. The PIC may have potential for helping scholars in the field of photography, but it seems in stark contrast to Simply Analytics which appears to be built with a wide range of the public in mind to allow them to dive in for pragmatic needs.

 

Other presentations fell somewhere in between, from how the NYPL’s historic visualizations can spark good design thinking to combining maps and pie graphs to analyze spatially the 1880 census data about Greenwich Village. All delightful. But the full array really got me thinking about the work we do at the GC. Particularly, I hope to ask myself of future projects questions such as, “How does this work directly benefit or interface with the public?”, “What does this tool or project assume about that public, its abilities, and its needs?”, and “How can we communicate the limitations of our data to avoid misleading users?”

Kelly’s Skills

I’m a seasoned educator and a budding hacker. If your project has didactic intent, I can help you shape your interface for your intended audience. If you need a courageous team member to learn a new program or coding language, I’m happy to do it. In my 20 years of tinkering with technology in the humanities, I see joy in every opportunity, from designing game-based play using TWINE and building critical collections in Manifold to automating the resizing of huge collections of images in Photoshop and creating envelope-pushing audio versions of text and primary sources. As a published author of fiction and a long-standing department chair and curriculum director, I’m also happy to write and edit.

Research
My passion for research has been reignited since entering the DH program. Last year’s courses led me to the collections of the Morgan Library and Schomburg Center for the sacred experience of holding in my hands an 1899 edition of The Yellow Wall-Paper and letters penned by Nella Larsen. I’ve loved the digital bloodhound pursuit as well, sniffing around the web for details about New York Times best-selling authors or merging and cleaning datasets from disparate sources.

Development
My skills are adolescent, but my persistence is professional! My most developed skills are HTML and CSS. For DH courses, I’ve done some decent work with Tableau and Python. I’ve tinkered with (and loved) JavaScript, SQL and Jekyll as well, though I’m far rockier there.

Design/UX
Last spring, in Patrick Smith’s Software Design Lab, I helped a peer create a network-independent website for teaching DH in prison. In considering the UX for that site, we did a lot of research into the psychology of prison reform, the psychology of color and layout, disabilities common among the imprisoned (there’s a disproportionate number of colorblind inmates), and W3C accessibility guidelines. What the Intro to DH course last term taught me is that good UX goes farther than that: you start with a diverse team, the principles of universal design, and a deep eagerness to detect implicit bias in the work. You also include loops of testing and feedback with a diverse group of reviewers. And even then, there’s still work to be done, such as versioning and clear crediting, as our reading for this week reminds us. I’m deeply committed to these issues of accessibility and universal design. (In fact, there are great accessibility tools even in WordPress that I think few have explored.)

On the more skill-specific side, I’ve used Photoshop for years and I’ve just begun to explore Illustrator, so I’m happy to create web graphics or logos as needed, though I don’t have a background in graphic design.

Project Management
Years of serving as a dean of studies and department chair have taught me that explicit expectations and clear deadlines can turn brilliant vision into reality. In order for a project to work well, team members need to agree on the timing, medium, and nature of their meetings and work—decisions that often vary widely from group to group. My experience with workflow apps has been limited to proprietary software for education, but I’m happy to learn.

A DH Journal for Secondary School Educators

ABSTRACT

Secondary-school digital humanists need a scholarly place to share their work and confront the challenges of the field together. This project aims ultimately to create a peer-reviewed, online journal—DH Juvenilia—solely dedicated to digital humanities (DH) pedagogy in grades 6 – 12. Such a space would promote elevated discourse, broaden access to well-critiqued and humanistic applications of technology, and provide a larger, interdisciplinary community for those working in the isolation of their classroom, department, school, or district. The journal would ultimately mirror the already fine model of The Journal of Interactive Technology and Pedagogy (JITP) which is geared toward a higher-education audience. (For the spring semester of DHUM 70002, the scope would be limited to the inaugural issue—a special edition of JITP.)  Like the JITP, this project would publish themed issues quarterly while maintaining on a rolling basis more frequent, short-form posts. The project would borrow the JITP’s open peer review process for issue articles (and post-publication review for short-form pieces), as well as its editorial sections highlighting lesson plans, step-by-step how-tos, reviews of new resources and conferences, reflections on failures, and explorations of classroom tools. Additionally, the project would include two features missing from the JITP: a section dedicated to considering issues of race and accessibility in the secondary-school DH classroom and a space featuring successful partnerships such as those between public and private schools or between schools and institutions such as local archives. To live up to the values espoused by those new sections, the project will actively seek diverse members for its board, reviewers, and contributors. Further, we will enlist editorial board members who are native Spanish speakers to review Spanish submissions and to translate published articles into Spanish—a small but important step toward greater globality.

 

STATEMENT OF INNOVATION

Currently, there is no defined online space or publication for digital humanists teaching grades 6 – 12, yet they outnumber their counterparts in higher education, and they were encouraged to experiment with digital technologies in the hands of their students far earlier. A journal dedicated to serious discussions of secondary-school humanities technology pedagogy will help practitioners recognize their place in the vertical field that feeds higher education, as well as in the horizontal field across geography and school systems throughout the English- and Spanish-speaking worlds. The journal would be the only space currently dedicated to technological issues of race and accessibility in the secondary-school humanities realm, and its editorial board would be built expressly to ensure that the team behind the journal had a range of personal experience with such issues.

 

STATEMENT OF HUMANITIES SIGNIFICANCE

Exciting and powerful applications of technology in the service of the secondary-school humanities classrooms have gotten lost in the recent clamor for STEM initiatives. In an age when humanity itself seems at peril, there has never been a greater need for collaborative, concerted thinking around how technology can enrich our ability to understand people, history, and culture. There is currently no dedicated space where librarians, historians, and teachers of arts and literature can share practice and move forward together as we pursue ways to employ new tools to help our students understand what it means to be human. More frightening still, as technology continues to develop at an exponential rate (and as facility with it is touted as a must-have professional skill), secondary-school educators are not being asked to think about how bias is replicated in and by that technology. Simply by its existence, this journal would reassert the creative and powerful vibrancy of the digital humanists working in 6 – 12 environments while challenging them to face head-on the colonial legacy often built in to the very tools they use to broaden student understanding.

 

LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

Patrick DeDauw, Managing Editor, The Journal of Interactive Technology and Pedagogy (advisor)

Matt Gold, Acting Director, M.A. Program in Digital Humanities & M.S. Program in Data Analysis and Visualization, CUNY Graduate Center (advisor)

Michelle McSweeney, Visiting Assistant Professor, Pratt Institute and CUNY Graduate Center, and JITP Assignments Editor (advisor)

Angela Gibson, Director of Scholarly Communication, Modern Language Association (consultant)

Ruha Benjamin, Associate Professor, Princeton University (consultant)

Kelly Hammond, student, CUNY Graduate Center (principal investigator)

Yolanda Martín, The Chapin School (Spanish translator)

Editorial developer

Web developer

CUNY Graduate Center Digital Fellows (support)

 

NARRATIVE

Enhancing the Humanities Through Innovation

As the modern fervor for STEM initiatives sweeps secondary-school funding and attention toward tech for tech’s sake, those innovating with technology in the study of literature, history, and arts are in need of community, public presence, and a philosophical touchstone. Like digital humanists in higher education, secondary-school DH practitioners are often siloed and scattered across departments and districts, and they may not even recognize that their work is part of a growing, global field. Harnessing that far-flung brilliance, sharpening it through peer review, and actively working to reach like-valued minds of radically different-lived experiences can push the boundaries of the field while building a stronger base of digital humanities students for college and university programs. Capturing this work is particularly essential to the broader humanities field, as secondary school teachers often have both greater license to experiment as well as a firmer grounding in pedagogy than their university counterparts. They are an untapped yet highly creative resource in the field, comfortable with failure and iteration in a way their higher-ed peers may not be. And, even without the occupational compulsion to publish, they are hungry to share their work, contributing to magazines, writing chapters of books, and creating their own blogs and podcasts.

 

Environmental Scan/DH Context

While there is no site or publication dedicated to scholarly discourse around digital humanities in the 6 – 12 classroom, there are myriad sites that offer limited slices of such a conversation. Perhaps the most recognized in the field is edutopia.org, the website launched in 2010 by filmmaker George Lucas’s educational foundation whose mission proclaims hopes of “transforming K-12 education so that all students can acquire and effectively apply the knowledge, attitudes, and skills necessary to thrive in their studies, careers, and adult lives.” Two of the site’s “six core learning strategies” connect to digital humanities philosophy: “technology integration” and “integrated studies.” But, users can browse blog posts only through single lenses such as those categories, grade level, or an area of study of which two are humanities realms—English Language Arts and literacy. The site’s blog posts are written by classroom teachers who receive private editorial feedback, but there is no peer review, no comments, no dialogue.

Lesser venerated sites, such as Creative Educator now in its twelfth year, offer similarly wide-ranging posts, including some DH-friendly categories such as “digital storytelling.” But Creative Educator is peppered with ads and promotes its own commercial offerings, such as professional development. Further, while some posts are made by authors or classroom teachers, others are by written by the editors themselves and some are unattributed altogether. Further, there is no transparency on the site or the parent site (Tech4Learning) that demonstrates any credentials or expertise in the field.

Secondary-school digital humanists, then, are left to forge their own paths for sharing their work. Some create their own blogs or sites, such as Jeremiah McCall’s Gaming the Past, which, while rich in pedagogical thinking around the digital humanities in secondary school, offers only one voice. Other teachers look to more diluted options such as submitting their work to educational publications focused on broader audiences or themes, such as the occasional technology edition of Independent School or Teachers & Writers magazines. Still others share their work at temporally and geographically bound conferences, as teachers from Manhattan’s Trevor Day School did in a panel discussion entitled “Digital Humanities in Middle and High School: Case Studies and Pedagogical Approaches” at the DH2018 conference—a forum not marketed to secondary schools. DH Juvenilia, by contrast, will plumb secondary school networks (from discipline specific organizations such as the National Council of Teachers of English to niche-specific organizations such as the National Association of Independent Schools) to allow teachers with compelling practices in digital humanities approaches in secondary school to connect with each other, to receive peer feedback, and to have an archived space to document the continued evolution of the growing field.

Bastions of the humanities, such as the Modern Language Association (MLA), have in recent years recognized the need to spend time and resources on innovative ideas in secondary schools. In the fall of 2018, the MLA held the “New Visions in for Humanities Teaching” conference, attempting to “bring together secondary school educators throughout the New York area to help establish a collective, concrete agenda for shaping the future of humanities teaching in secondary schools.” Both the keynote address by William Adams (senior fellow at the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and former chair of the National Endowment for the Humanities) and the breakout sessions gave significant time to digital humanities projects and concerns. DH Juvenilia would provide digital space for that MLA-imagined future to be realized, but would dream far beyond the narrow limits of New York City.

Fortunately, the JITP has provided a shining example both of how such a space might be constructed and the high level of discourse it could generate. The JITP accepts occasional pieces about DH in secondary schools, but the journal is targeted toward a higher-ed audience, so the bulk of its fine offerings remain out of reach for teachers of younger students. DH Juvenilia would gather pedagogically exciting ideas sprung directly from secondary-school digital humanities and could address logistical challenges unique to its practitioners. For example, the Children’s Online Privacy and Protection Act adopted in 1998 radically affects middle-school technology use, as do parent concerns about screen time and social media throughout the teen years. Further, secondary school teachers are responsible for protecting students as they begin to create their own digital footprints without having reached biological adulthood—an issue less of a priority for teachers of undergraduates.

While other DH journals provide excellent models as well, the JITP is created and hosted in CUNY’s WordPress environment and shares staff with this project’s participant list, allowing the opportunity for direct partnership and coordinated stewardship.

In addition to providing for middle- and high-school educators what the JITP offers, DH Juvenilia would address head-on issues about race and accessibility. Diversity and inclusion have been significant topics in secondary education for the last two decades, yet, in Race After Technology, Ruha Benjamin cautions, “While more institutions and people are outspoken against blatant racism, discriminatory practices are becoming more deeply embedded within the sociotechnical infrastructure of everyday life” (34). And, while groups such as the Postcolonial Digital Humanities community on the MLA Commons do grapple online with such issues, the conversation is eerily silent in secondary schools, especially private schools with the greatest access to resources.

Tackling issues of race and accessibility is all the more essential in consideration of the fact that secondary school is where students’ identities and senses of cultural norms are concretized. In addition, teachers of students in grades 6 – 12 guide kids when they form tech habit, so using technology to understand, serve, and create for humanity can intervene in the pattern of bias replication and technological carelessness endemic in the world of unmoderated, viral memes and ever more rapid hardware releases.

Perhaps more importantly, students themselves are clamoring for this level of debate, as young activists such as Greta Thunberg and Jaclyn Corin (co-founder of the March for Our Lives movement) make clear. The digital humanities brings to these students investigations that matter through means that captivate them. With the intent of nourishing their teachers, this project will hone craft and spread ideas about ways that digital humanities can empower students seeking social justice. As Matthew K. Gold and Lauren F. Klein have urged us in “A DH That Matters” (from Debates in the Digital Humanities, 2019), “We must therefore commit to making a digital humanities that matters beyond itself, one that probes the stakes and impacts of technology across a range of institutions and communities.” Making DH matter is even more essential for kids entering the digital space at the same time as they enter adolescence. This project will encourage thoughtful applications that in turn generate thoughtful experiences at this incredibly critical time in a child’s life.

Further, this project will broaden the very borders of the “big tent” of digital humanities. Already, powerful DH projects are thriving in sixth- to twelfth-grade classrooms: students are critiquing historically themed video games by digging into primary sources, building Scratch projects that experiment with poetic forms, “making over” data visualizations around social injustice, mapping the history and stories of their own neighborhoods, or literally giving voice to women of the past by creating dramatic recordings of letters from the 1770s to the 1940s tucked away in the archives. This project will give that work a public space and give its creators and the field a place to grow through peer review and the exchange of ideas.

 

Work plan

With the model of the JITP and its staff at hand, this project has a leg up from the start. We imagine the following timeline:

Step 1: Values and Vision (January – February)

With guidance from our seasoned consultants and advisors, we will commit to mission language, guidelines for articles and short-form pieces, criteria for peer reviewers, and accessibility protocols for the site as well as for submissions. (Though we intend to use CUNY-hosted WordPress as our platform, especially as we learn from and potentially partner with the JITP, we are eager to increase accessibility beyond the current model.) This stage includes research into secondary-school networks and publications that can reach a wide array of digital humanists in English- and Spanish-speaking schools around the globe.

 

Stage 2: Execution (March – April)

With a diverse team, we will build the architecture of the site with universal design as our philosophy. This stage includes confirming decisions about hosting and platform, as well as choosing layout and design. At this time, we will also solicit diverse contributors and reviewers for the pilot issue, to launch September of 2020.

 

Stage 3: Testing and Evaluation (May)

With the site designed, we will test it against our values and vision, with a range of audiences, including those with physical and attentional limitations as well as those from a range of identities and on a variety of devices and networks. In this stage we will be actively pursuing our blind spots—decisions that we made based on our own limited perspectives or technological ability.

 

Stage 4: Editorial Cultivation (June and July)

In this phase we will focus on making sure that our first issue is substantial, compelling, and well written. This phase is timed intentionally, as many secondary-school digital humanists in the northern and southern hemispheres have substantial (though seasonally inverted) breaks in the course of these months. During this time, our editors and peer reviewers will help shape the pieces that will set the tone for the site’s inauguration.

 

Stage 5: Staging and Launch (August and September)

As we populate the site with the articles from our first issue, we will doubtless find the need for additional changes to site layout or design. We will begin a pre-launch marketing campaign via the networks we addressed in early research, and will push our Twitter account to gather a following through which we can announce the later release of short-form pieces as well as new themes for upcoming issues. We will launch in late August or early September—the start of the school year for many northern hemisphere countries and the month after a long break for many of those in the southern hemisphere.

 

Staff

Patrick DeDauw, Managing Editor, The Journal of Interactive Technology and Pedagogy (advisor)

Kelly Hammond, student, CUNY Graduate Center (principal investigator and managing editor)

Yolanda Martín, The Chapin School (Spanish translator)

Editorial developers (3)

Outreach manager

Web developers (2)

Accessibility manager (to push issues of universal design, accessibility, and sustainability)

 

Final Product and Dissemination

During the Vision and Values stage, we will research school networks in the English- and Spanish-speaking worlds, seeking avenues for reaching our audience beyond our own, more immediate spheres, such as the National Association for Independent Schools and Columbia University’s Teachers College. We will also tap into local expertise such as CUNY’s graduate program for Urban Education. Further, we will leverage our principal investigator’s recent work with the MLA and the JITP to broaden our reach through their sites and networks as well. We will take even further advantage of our staff’s partnerships with institutions such as New York’s Juilliard School of Music and Gilder-Lehrman Institute, Boston’s Museum of Fine Arts, Washington’s Kennedy Center, Cincinnati’s Contemporary Arts Center, and Chicago’s Historical Society to seek educators of a wide range of disciplines. We will conduct a pre-launch campaign through these networks. Submitters and peer reviewers will also do their part to share the launch with their peers and partnerships around the world.

In the iterative spirit of the digital humanities, we plan to recruit new editorial management every two years—especially important turnover as the field itself expands to accommodate new technologies and approaches and as we expand our understanding of what it means to be inclusive. We will actively seek asynchronous, low-bandwidth ways for the editorial team to meet and manage workflow, so that the editorial board can be increasingly international regardless of time zone and internet speed.

 

WORKS CITED

“About Us.” Edutopia, https://edutopia.org/about. Accessed 18 Dec. 2019.

Benjamin, Ruha. Race after Technology : Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Polity, 2019.

“Creative Educator | A Creative Approach to Teaching.” Creative Educator, https://creativeeducator.tech4learning.com/ . Accessed 18 Dec. 2019.

Digital Humanities in Middle and High School: Case Studies and Pedagogical Approaches-DH2018. https://dh2018.adho.org/en/digital-humanities-in-middle-and-high-school-case-studies-and-pedagogical-approaches/ . Accessed 18 Dec. 2019.

“Gaming the Past.” Gaming the Past, https://gamingthepast.net/ . Accessed 18 Dec. 2019.

“‘Introduction’ in ‘Debates in the Digital Humanities 2019’ on Manifold.” Debates in the Digital Humanities, https://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/read/untitled-f2acf72c-a469-49d8-be35-67f9ac1e3a60/section/0cd11777-7d1b-4f2c-8fdf-4704e827c2c2#intro . Accessed 18 Dec. 2019.

“MLA Conversations Series.” Modern Language Association, https://www.mla.org/Convention/MLA-Conversations-Series . Accessed 18 Dec. 2019.